• AI Discoveries
  • Posts
  • Trump Just Launched AI's "Manhattan Project"—But the Real Winners Might Surprise You

Trump Just Launched AI's "Manhattan Project"—But the Real Winners Might Surprise You

PLUS: Claude Opus 4.5 crushes GPT-5.1 in coding (and costs 67% less), ChatGPT becomes your Black Friday shopping assistant, and why AI productivity might actually be making you slower

 

📌 Hot News For Today (with a Take)

 Trump's "Genesis Mission" Could Be AI's Apollo Moment—Or Just Another Data Center Race

President Trump launched the Genesis Mission on November 25, 2025, a national AI initiative aimed at accelerating scientific discovery by integrating federal supercomputers, datasets, and AI models into one unified platform led by the Department of Energy.

Here's what everyone's missing: This isn't about beating China or winning some tech race. The Genesis Mission is essentially turning America's National Labs into the world's largest AI training ground—using taxpayer-funded data that took decades to build. While the administration compares it to the Manhattan Project, the real story is about who gets access to this infrastructure.

Will it be locked to government contractors, or will startups and researchers actually benefit? The timing is also fascinating—it drops the same week Anthropic hit a $350 billion valuation and OpenAI launched shopping features. Big Tech doesn't need federal help; small innovators do. The question is: will this mission democratize AI infrastructure, or just subsidize the giants who already dominate?

History suggests moonshot programs work when they have clear goals (literally, the moon). "Accelerate scientific discovery" is vague enough to become a trillion-dollar blank check. The real test? Whether this creates breakthroughs regular people can use—not just better weapons and Wall Street algorithms.

📌 How to Actually Use AI to Save 20 Hours Per Week (Not Just Generate More Work)

Everyone says AI makes you more productive, but studies show developers using AI coding tools actually take 19% longer on familiar tasks. The key isn't using more AI—it's using it strategically for the right work.

Step-by-Step Process:

Step 1: Identify Your "Shallow Work" vs. "Deep Work" Map your weekly tasks into two buckets: repetitive, rule-based tasks (emails, data entry, scheduling) and complex, creative work (strategy, problem-solving, original thinking). AI excels at the first, struggles with the second. Audit your calendar and list everything that feels like "busywork"—those are your AI automation targets.

Step 2: Start with the 90/10 Rule Choose tasks where AI can get you 90% of the way there with minimal cleanup. Examples: drafting routine emails, summarizing meeting notes, creating first-draft social posts, or organizing research. Avoid using AI for tasks where the "last 10%" (fact-checking, nuance, final polish) takes as long as doing it manually.

Step 3: Build Your Productivity Stack (Don't Collect Tools) Pick 3-5 tools max: one for writing (ChatGPT, Claude), one for task automation (Zapier, Make), one for meetings (Otter.ai, Fathom), one for research (Perplexity, NotebookLM), and one for focused work (Motion, Asana). More tools = more context-switching = less productivity.

Step 4: Create Reusable Prompts and Workflows Don't start from scratch every time. Build a "prompt library" for recurring tasks: weekly report templates, client email frameworks, content outlines. Save these as snippets or automations. The real productivity boost comes from systems, not one-off AI tricks.

Step 5: Measure Actual Outcomes, Not Just Speed Track whether AI actually saved time or just created more drafts to edit. Ask: "Did this help me finish faster AND maintain quality?" If you're spending equal time reviewing AI output, adjust your approach. Productivity is about better results, not just feeling busy faster.

📌 Personal Story to Inspire

The Developer Who Let Claude Opus 4.5 Write 2,000 Lines of Code in Two Days—Here's What Happened

Simon Willison, an AI researcher and developer, gave Claude Opus 4.5 early access to refactor his entire open-source project over a weekend. It handled 20 commits across 39 files with 2,022 additions and 1,173 deletions in just two days. But the story isn't about speed—it's about what he learned when his preview expired and he had to finish the work himself.

The Story: Simon spent the weekend watching Claude Opus 4.5 systematically restructure sqlite-utils, his Python library used by thousands of developers. He described feeling like he had a "brilliant intern" who could navigate complex codebases, understand context, and make intelligent refactoring decisions. The AI didn't just write code—it explained trade-offs, suggested improvements, and even caught edge cases Simon had missed.

Then Sunday night at 8 PM, his preview access expired. Suddenly, he was back to manual coding for the remaining issues. The contrast was stark: tasks that Claude handled in minutes took him hours. But here's the twist—going back to manual work made him realize something crucial: the AI was incredible at implementation, but he was still the one deciding what to build, why it mattered, and whether it aligned with his vision for the project.

Key Lesson: AI won't replace developers—it will replace developers who refuse to think strategically. Claude Opus 4.5 scored over 80% on SWE-bench Verified, becoming the first model to achieve this milestone in software engineering benchmarks. But the bottleneck isn't coding speed anymore—it's knowing what to build and why. The developers who thrive in 2025 aren't the fastest coders; they're the ones who master problem definition, system design, and product thinking. Let AI handle the implementation. You focus on the vision. That's the real productivity unlock.

📌 Guide / How-to for the Day

 How to Turn ChatGPT Into Your Personal Shopping Assistant This Holiday Season

OpenAI just launched Shopping Research in ChatGPT, a new feature that researches products across the web, asks clarifying questions, and builds personalized buyer's guides in minutes. Perfect timing for Black Friday and holiday shopping—but only if you know how to use it right.

Step-by-Step Guide:

Step 1: Start with Specific Constraints, Not Vague Requests Bad prompt: "Find me a laptop." Good prompt: "Find me a lightweight laptop under $1,200 for video editing, with at least 16GB RAM and good battery life. I travel a lot, so portability matters more than a huge screen."

The more specific you are about budget, use case, and priorities, the better ChatGPT's recommendations.

Step 2: Let ChatGPT Ask You Questions Shopping Research asks smart clarifying questions about budget, who the item is for, and which features matter most. Don't skip these—they help the AI understand trade-offs. For example, it might ask: "Would you sacrifice some battery life for a better display?" These questions refine your results dramatically.

Step 3: Use the Interactive Feedback Feature Once ChatGPT shows you options, mark items as "Not interested" or "More like this." The AI adapts in real-time and re-scopes the search. This is where the magic happens—it learns your preferences and adjusts recommendations accordingly.

Step 4: Cross-Reference Prices Before Buying OpenAI warns the model can still make mistakes around product availability and pricing. Always verify the final price on the retailer's site. One test found ChatGPT quoted $110 for Ugg slippers, but the actual website price was $150. Use it as a research tool, not a price guarantee.

Step 5: Leverage ChatGPT Memory for Repeat Purchases If you enable Memory, ChatGPT remembers your preferences from past conversations. Shopping for a gift for someone you've mentioned before? It'll recall their interests and suggest accordingly. This gets smarter over time.

Try Shopping Research today—it's free for all ChatGPT users through the holidays with nearly unlimited usage. Ask it: "Help me find the perfect gift for a 10-year-old who loves science." Watch how it works, then bookmark your best prompts for future shopping. Reply and share your best finds!

📌 AI Product of the Day (Mini Review)

Claude Opus 4.5: Why Anthropic Just Reclaimed the Coding Crown (And Slashed Prices by 67%)

Anthropic launched Claude Opus 4.5 on November 24, 2025, calling it "the best model in the world for coding, agents, and computer use." It's not just hype—it beat GPT-5.1 and Gemini 3 on every major benchmark while dropping prices from $15/$75 per million tokens to just $5/$25.

Key Features & Verdict:

✅ State-of-the-Art Coding Performance – First model to score over 80% (80.9%) on SWE-bench Verified, the gold standard for real-world software engineering tasks. Handles complex, multi-step debugging and code refactoring that were "near-impossible" for Sonnet 4.5 just weeks ago.

✅ Superior Computer Use & Browser Control – Now available as Claude for Chrome extension (for all Max users) and Claude for Excel (for Max, Team, and Enterprise users). It can actually navigate browsers, click buttons, and interact with web apps—not just generate code.

✅ Aggressive Price Cut Makes It Accessible – At $5 input/$25 output per million tokens, it's now competitive with GPT-5.1 ($1.25/$10) and Gemini 3 Pro ($2/$12), though still pricier. Previous Opus pricing was $15/$75, making this a 67% price reduction. Finally affordable for production use.

✅ Enhanced Memory & "Endless Chat" – No more hitting context limits mid-conversation. New memory system supports stronger long-context reasoning with automatic context compression, enabling seamless "endless chat" functionality.

⚠️ Still Vulnerable to Prompt Injection – Safety testing shows single attempts at prompt injection still work 1/20 times, and with ten different attack attempts, success rate jumps to 1/3. Better than competitors, but not foolproof—design applications assuming motivated attackers can trick the model.

Who It's Best For: Professional developers, AI researchers, and anyone building agentic workflows. If you're doing complex coding, multi-step automation, or building AI tools that need to "use a computer," this is your new default model.

Try Opus 4.5 via claude.ai (Pro/Max plans) or API using claude-opus-4-5-20251101. Test it on your hardest coding challenge and see if it lives up to the hype. Reply if you've tried it—we want to hear your experience!

📌 Tech Jobs of the Day

 3 High-Paying Remote AI Jobs Hiring This Week (Up to $313K)

The AI hiring boom continues with companies desperate for ML engineers, AI product leads, and research scientists. These roles offer full remote flexibility, competitive comp, and a chance to work on cutting-edge projects.

Job List:

1. Machine Learning Engineer (Generative Video & Visual Models)
Company: Arc.dev (via top startups)
Pay: $120K - $180K base + equity
Location: Remote (Worldwide)
Why It's Worth It: Work on generative video models powering the next generation of AI content tools. Requirements include Python, AWS, Kubernetes, FastAPI, and experience with RESTful APIs. This is ground-floor opportunity in one of AI's hottest areas.
Apply: Arc.dev Remote AI Jobs

2. Senior AI Software Engineer – Centre of Excellence
Company: First American (Fortune 500)
Pay: $150K - $250K (estimated)
Location: Remote (USA) – Hybrid option with 2 days/week in office
Why It's Worth It: Join a transformative team building AI infrastructure for a major enterprise. They're specifically seeking candidates to join their AI Centre of Excellence—this is strategic, high-impact work, not just another dev role. Strong ML, data analysis, and Python skills required.
Apply: ZipRecruiter AI Engineer Jobs

3. Distinguished AI Engineer (Director Level)
Company: Capital One
Pay: $149K - $313K (depending on geographic market)
Location: Remote-Eligible (Open to remote except SD, VT, WV)
Why It's Worth It: Capital One states they are creating responsible and reliable AI systems, changing banking for good. This is leadership-level work shaping AI strategy at scale. Looking for expertise in TensorFlow, Azure, GCP, AWS, and software deployment. If you want to influence how AI is used in financial services, this is it.
Apply: Glassdoor AI Engineer Remote Jobs

Bonus Tip: Don't have 5+ years of AI experience? Consider AI data specialist roles with RWS TrainAI Community—remote, part-time, flexible hours, and no experience required. You'll rate, annotate, and provide feedback on AI training data. Great for breaking into the field while earning. Apply here

Final Thought: The AI world moved FAST this week—from government moonshots to breakthrough models to shopping assistants. The winners in 2025 won't be the people who use the most AI tools. They'll be the ones who know when to use AI, what to delegate to it, and what to keep human. That's the real skill worth building.

What's your take on the Genesis Mission? Have you tried Claude Opus 4.5 or ChatGPT Shopping Research? Hit reply and let us know—we read every response!